Defending Record Profits
by Bill Shein
FOLLOWING LAST week's news that ExxonMobil, the world's
largest publicly traded oil company, earned a remarkable
$9.9 billion in the third quarter, there was a predictable
outcry across America: How can we tolerate massive energy-company
profits at a time when working families are struggling
to afford gasoline and heating oil?
My response? Quit complaining. Because before jumping
on the "attack the oil companies" bandwagon,
it's only fair to ask one simple question: Who among us
can honestly say they've never, even once, earned a $9.9
billion profit in just 90 days?
The answer, of course, is "very few of us indeed."
Like ExxonMobil's, my own $9.9 billion windfall arrived
just a few weeks ago. Thanks to the skyrocketing wholesale
price of newspaper columns, continued high demand, and
Congressional approval of new tax breaks and subsidies
for the newspaper-column industry, my profit-and-loss
statement for the third quarter showed net income of $9.9
billion.
Did I feel guilty, apologize, and give some of the money
back? Should I be embarrassed that during wartime, I had
to rent a self-storage unit just to warehouse all of my
cash?
Of course not. As ExxonMobil was quick to point out last
week, many businesses — including newspaper columnizing
— are cyclical, and massive profits one year often
become slightly less massive profits the next.
Besides, our federal government is clearly on my side.
That's why it recently approved legislation that grants
billions of dollars to newspaper columnists "to increase
production of news-based opinion columns and reduce America's
reliance on foreign — possibly French — sources
of commentary."
(The column bill also creates a loophole in the Clean
Water Act to allow runoff from column-writing sites to
flow into rivers and streams.)
Why do newspaper columnists need tax dollars to pay for
the research, development, and column production that
we're doing anyway? Why are we allowed to skirt important
environmental regulations? And, most astonishingly, why
do we get special treatment at a time when newspaper columnists
like me are enjoying record profits?
I have no idea. But Congress thinks we should. And such
an august and democratic body certainly wouldn't put the
interests of billionaire newspaper columnists ahead of
all Americans, would it?
Sure, cynics like to claim that newspaper columnists
only won profit-enhancing subsidies because we spent $314.4
million lobbying Congress, the White House, and federal
agencies in 2003 and 2004 — the same amount spent
by the energy industry. And also by spreading millions
of dollars in campaign contributions around Capitol Hill.
I have a message for the cynics: If you don't like the
way the system works, go ahead and start your own little
utopian democracy somewhere else, traitors.
Set it up however you like, too. Go ahead and end corporate
personhood, so that giant corporations — legally
required to make as much money as possible — don't
have the same constitutional rights as living, breathing
human beings.
Democratically finance your political campaigns with
full public financing, which will cost $1.8 billion a
year. Where will you find the money for that? In your
$419.3 billion 2006 defense budget? Yeah, good luck.
And even choose your president "Afghan style,"
with a direct popular election, so every voter, in every
state, has equal power. Whatever.
Do that, and anything else you want, and see what happens.
Because in America today, where the most profitable industries
receive special treatment from lawmakers and the president,
and 43 percent of the 198 House and Senate members who
have left office since 1998 are now registered lobbyists,
everything is working just fine.
And I'm not just saying that because I'm a billionaire
newspaper columnist. I really mean it.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bill Shein is president of the Billionaire Newspaper
Columnists Guild of America.
(This column originally appeared in the Berkshire
Eagle newspaper on November 2, 2005. Join a discussion
about this column in Bill's blog.
And read Bill's previous column, "Me
and Garrison").
|