Violence, Inc.
by Bill Shein
In the news this week were three items that highlight
our cultural and political tolerance of real and fictional
violence.
First was a report that "Grand Theft Auto"
includes sexually explicit content hidden inside this
gratuitously violent video "game." Sen. Hillary
Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., responded loudly with a letter
to the Federal Trade Commission in which she said, "We
should all be deeply disturbed that a game, which now
permits the simulation of lewd sexual acts in an interactive
format with highly realistic graphics, has fallen into
the hands of young people across the country."
Her letter also mentions video game violence. But why
does sex, and not violence, raise so many more hackles
in our society? Indeed, we are shocked -- shocked! --
by split-second "wardrobe malfunctions," suggestive
sitcom dialogue, and the over-the-top sexuality that fills
prime-time television and permeates so much media and
advertising.
But we embrace all kinds of violence with inexplicable
fervor and far less complaining -- particularly on television,
where the top-rated dramas are almost exclusively about
crime, murder, violence and dead bodies. Thanks largely
to television, violence has become the destructive background
noise of American society. Perhaps that's why the daily
bloodshed in Iraq just blurs into the river of real and
fictional violence spewing out of the tube, dulling our
emotions and sense of outrage about what our tax dollars
are funding.
The second, related item was an underreported comment
made by the president's homeland security adviser, Fran
Townsend. In the wake of the London terrorist bombings,
she defended the president's Iraq policy with the claim
that, by waging war in Iraq, we attract terrorists to
a place "where we have a fighting military and a
coalition that can take them on and not have the sort
of civilian casualties that you saw in London."
That a top presidential adviser could so easily ignore
the tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians who have died
during and after the U.S. invasion is remarkable. Though
it does serve to highlight the moral bankruptcy of the
president's favorite applause line, "We're fighting
the enemy abroad so we don't have to fight them here at
home." Translated, that means as long as it's only
foreign civilians killed in distant lands, our policy
is justified.
The third extraordinary item was news of Stephen Bochco's
upcoming Iraq war drama, "Over There," which
premieres July 27 on Fox's FX cable network.
Early reviews describe it as a blood-spattered drama
that powerfully shows the "reality" of the Iraq
war. An article in the San Jose Mercury News summed up
the carnage this way: "The combat scenes have such
veracity that they look like footage from embedded TV
news crews caught up in firefights between U.S. troops
and insurgents. The scenes are so accurate that they're
certainly not for the faint of heart, with body parts
flying and the horrific wounding of men (and women) on
both sides."
FX president of entertainment John Landgraf has dismissed
criticism of "Over There" by focusing on its
"apolitical" view of the war. "I would
defy someone to say there's either a liberal or conservative
bias" in the show, he told the Los Angeles Times
last December.
That misses the point. The program -- conceived by Landgraf
himself -- aims to generate profit from the tragedy still
unfolding in Iraq. And that's an outrage, especially when,
across the hall at Fox News, this war is promoted at every
opportunity.
In fact, "Over There" represents a new kind
of war profiteering for the media age. Fox can't make
money by securing government contracts for bombs or bullets
or tanks. But it can support the march to war with terrible,
flag-waving "journalism" on Fox News and then
profit from the bloody conflict with violent, war-themed
programming elsewhere.
In a revealing move, Fox's home entertainment division
will release the pilot episode of "Over There"
on DVD on Aug. 2, just six days after it appears on TV.
Why? Because as the New York Times noted in January, "If
American troops are pulled out this summer, when FX hopes
to broadcast the "Over There" pilot, it could
undermine the premise of the show, not to mention public
interest in it."
And wouldn't that be a shame.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bill Shein's column is always 100 percent violence-free.
(This column originally appeared in the Berkshire
Eagle newspaper on July 17, 2005. Click here to read
Bill's previous column, "Rethinking
Gay Marriage").
|