Thursday, May 26, 2005
Beyond Explanation
Transparent, Yet Unreported
But then - surprise! - a day later, an anonymous U.S. official just happens to show The Times a secret memo that criticizes Karzai for the increased poppy production in Afghanistan (a country which, by the way, he has surprisingly little control over). SLAP! The papers are filled with stories about poppy production as Karzai lands in the U.S., taking the focus off the ugly fact that the United States tortures people.
That, my friends, is classic "crisis communications" that our White House has been so adept at in recent years. That's what happens when you fill your press and communications staff with people who come out of -- or go through the revolving door from -- corporate PR.
(By the way, Scott McClellan finally backed away from his claims about the Newsweek story's impact. That's also typical -- a week or so after milking some PR value from a lie, the WH quietly backpedals, and if it's reported, it's buried on page A-324234. Nice.)
Yep, 60 Bullets Oughta Do It
Oh, Thank Goodness!
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
"Global Religious War" - Coming Soon to a Planet Near You!
"America, 2005: In a Nutshell"
"Senate confirms Owen for circuit court"
"Number of millionaires hits new record"
"Indiana executes killer who wanted to give liver to sister"
"U.S. unleashes 'surprise' offensive in Iraq"
"Amnesty slams U.S. on human rights"
"Who will be the new 'Idol'?
What a disaster. Fortunately, there's a way out of the madness if you scroll further down the page: "NASA seeks oxygen source on the moon"
CUT TO: Shein constructing rocket ship in basement...
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Fixing the Formatting...
Sunday, May 22, 2005
Remember the Film 'After Hours'?
Everything About This is Just Plain Wrong
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
A Growing Chorus?
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
I Am Both Outraged and Speechless
Further, the claim that the media shouldn't use anonymous sources flies in the face of the administration's own careful use of unnamed sources -- on a daily basis -- to promote its policies. As I suggested earlier today, it was part of the PR strategy in the run-up to the Iraq war -- and we know how truthful those sources were.
Journalists and media organizations must move away from stories that are only single sourced, particularly if the source is anonymous. But for the White House to place the blame for the poor (understatement heavy) view of the United States among the world community is simply preposterous and counter-productive.
Not to mention that our very own chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Richard Myers, said a few days ago that the violence in Afghanistan had nothing to do with the Newsweek report -- indeed, and this is perhaps the most revealing twist, the Pentagon did not refute the Newsweek claims when given an opportunity before the story ran. Then, 10 days later, after a source suddenly got cold feet, they pounced.
Disgusting.
P.S. I guess I'm not speechless. But man, I am angry.
Diversion to the Max!
"We appreciate the step that Newsweek took yesterday," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said. "It was a good first step. And what we would like to see now is for Newsweek to work to help repair the damage that has been done, particularly in the region, and Newsweek certainly has the ability to help undo what damage can be undone."
While offering few specifics, McClellan said Newsweek should explain "what happened and why they got it wrong, particularly to people in the region."
"They can also talk about policies and practices of the United States military. Our United States military goes out of its way to treat the holy Koran with great care and respect," he said.
CUT TO: Copies of the Koran being treated with "great care and respect" while so-called detainees (aka "human beings") are sexually abused, subjected to torture and near-torture, and "rendered" to foreign countries where they can really have the screws put to them.
Believe me, Muslims around the world don't need this episode to feel fanned by the Washington-fueled flames of a global religious war. When it comes to Guantanamo, the "policies and practices of the United States military," as McClellan says so benignly, have been in violation of international law, contrary to American ideals, and simply despicable.
We'll see how the facts play out in the flushing incident; the Newsweek story was about a pending Pentagon report. There's a bit of nuance required to understand the media story here, but it's entirely possible the incident(s) actually took place. Defense attorneys for several of the detainees have reported similarly outrageous conduct by interrogators.
Monday, May 16, 2005
Worth Reading (and Forwarding)
A good question, of course, is why it took the major U.S. media a full 10 days to properly report on this. I have yet to read or hear a good explanation for that.
Another Question
Next, it's quite interesting and hypocritical for the administration to condemn Newsweek for using anonymous sources. After all, in the run-up to the Iraq war, there seemed to be a single-sourced story (anonymous Pentagon source, usually) every day trumping up the fictitious reasons for war. The administration seemed to have no problem with that.
Finally, we'll see how the facts play out, but Newsweek -- and the rest of the media -- should have long ago stopped using single, anonymous sources for stories except in the most extraordinary of circumstances. Remember in "All the President's Men" when "Woodstein" worked like mad to get multiple sources to confirm facts? Ah, such a quaint notion of responsible journalism, ain't it?

